Jonathan Steiman
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Photos
  • My Dad's Photos
  • About Me
  • Contact

"Finance-ability" Frameworks for Venture Deals

3/1/2012

4 Comments

 
Several years ago, I negotiated my first term sheet with an angel investor. At the time, I was raising money for a company I founded with Brent Ridge -- yes, the same Brent from “The Fabulous Beekman Boys”. We were fresh-faced students and first-time entrepreneurs negotiating with a first-time angel. Neither of us knew what we were doing, so the negotiation devolved into who could swing the biggest one. No shocker here: the deal fell through and our company was not funded.

During the negotiation, I remember thinking, “Why isn’t there a framework to at least start the conversation about the deal terms?” Anything was better than just throwing outrageous numbers on the wall to see what stuck.

Well, after years of experience and studying, I have learned that there is a framework for evaluating early stage deals - in fact, there are two. I have built models for both frameworks and made them available as a Google Template; also available at the bottom of this post. If you’re an early stage investor, these models will help you evaluate deals. And if you’re an entrepreneur, they will help you understand how investors should be thinking about your opportunity.

As you use these tools, please remember they are not valuating your company. Rather, these frameworks evaluate the deal. In industry-speak, the tools test “finance-ability”

And one last thing: Please note, only change the YELLOW cells.

The VC Method
The first framework is called The VC Method, which is well documented by Andrew Metrick and Ayako Yasuda. The VC Method compares the present value (PV) of a future exit with the current investment. If the PV of an exit is greater than the current investment, than invest. If it is smaller, than walk away.

Let’s look at an example. The deal on the table is as follows: $250,000 for 33% of the company. Ok, that is pretty straightforward. Now, put on your thinking caps. To understand the PV of an exit we need to know (i) the potential size of an exit, (ii) the probability chance of the exit occurring, (iii) the number of years until said exit, (iv) how much dilution will occur between today and the exit and, finally, (v) the VC cost of capital. Ok, that is a lot. Where to begin?

Exit size is obviously the biggest “what-if.” Could you have called $23B for a search engine in 1998? Probably not. So pick a reasonable number based on the market you’re entering and then adjust with a probability chance of success. For this illustration, let’s assume a 50% chance of a $10M exit. Again, the exit size and the probability chance of the exit depends on the market opportunity, strength of the team, economic conditions -- and the list goes on. Get familiar with these factors and populate the model as you like.

The next three factors are a bit easier. Time to exit refers to how long the investment will be locked away. It could be as little as one year or ten-plus years. Three to five years is a good middle ground. Retention is a measurement of dilution; more specifically, it is the stake in the company at the time of exit as a percent of the original stake. And lastly, the VC Cost of capital is the discount rate. This refers to the cost of capital on the entire VC portfolio and not this single investment. Why? Because risk was already factored in when we assigned a probability chance to the exit. Thus, the average VC is looking for a 15-20% return. This can change as market conditions change; for example, if interest rates climb, than VC cost of capital will, too.

Alright, that’s a lot of info, so let’s go back to the template. The template is pre-populated with assumptions that our $250,000 investment in exchange for 33% of the company has a 50% chance of exiting for $10M in 3 years. We also assumed significant dilution (50%) and a 15% cost of capital. Drum roll, please....Under those assumptions, it is a good investment because the expect return is $547k, which is greater than the initial $250,000 invested.

Play around with the numbers and see what you get. For example, if you lower the probability chance of a $10M exit to 20%, which is reasonable, the deal becomes unfavorable. Or, if everything is held constant constant except it takes 3-times as long to exit (9 years), then the deal becomes unfavorable.

What percent is the correct percent
In the above method, we assume that the deal is structured: $250k for 33% of the company, take it or leave it. Well, this is often not the case. What often happens is the company is looking for a certain amount of capital and the investor needs to decide what amount of equity they need in return.

The second model on the tab entitled “% of company required” calculates the minimum equity stake required for a particular deal. This model is taught by Alexander Ljungqvist of NYU Stern. If the investor gets less equity than model calculates, than they will not achieve the target rate of return -- a bad thing. But if the investor gets more, than it is all gravy.

This is a much more straight forward model, so let’s dive in. The first variable is simple: How much is the company asking for? In this illustration, let’s assume $1M. In terms of dilution, it is an early stage deal so let’s assume 50%.

Now we get to the exit, which is more difficult indeed. Again, the size and timing of an exit depends on the market opportunity, the team, the company’s competitive advantage, plus hundreds of other factors. Take all these factors into consideration and come up with a reasonable best case scenario. For this example, I assume a $25M exit in 5 years.

Ok, last part: the investor’s target rate of return. In the previous model, we used the return on the portfolio and represented risk with the probability chance of an exit. In this model, we simply use the target rate of return for this one investment. Thus, the return is greater to reflect the risk of this investment and because of the need to supplement other investments that will be dogs. A rate as low as 25% to as high as 60% is acceptable. For this model, I assume 45%.

So without further adieu, a $1M investment in a company that gets diluted by 50% and exits in 5 years for $25M requires an equity stake 38.46%, assuming a 45% target return. Again, play around with the numbers. For example, by lowering the exit size to $20M but moving the exit up 1 year, the required stake falls to 33.15%.

Lastly, I have built another tool that allows you to see what the return will be for a given equity stake. For example, if instead of getting 38.46% of the company you get 10%, the investor’s return will be 10.76%. This is well below the target rate of return and thus unacceptable.
4 Comments
Columbus Girls link
7/9/2012 04:09:00 am

Found this link while searching Google, thanks

Reply
Stock Tips link
12/30/2012 06:14:46 pm

Pay great thanks for this blogging here which is really helpful for everyone in terms of making strong economy with the help of right content...




Reply
Tax plantation link
4/9/2013 07:20:22 pm

The useful developing abilities usually are clear in this publishing. I'm sure the best factor concerning this information is usually that it’s complete of amazing still information. The facts is usually top-notch.

Reply
Best Equity Tips link
5/1/2014 04:16:02 pm

This is the perfect blog for anyone who wants to know about this topic.It contains truly information.Your website is very useful. I admire the valuable advice you make available in your expertly written content.I want to thank you for this informative read;I really appreciate sharing this great..

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    JONATHAN STEIMAN
    Follow @jonsteiman
    I'm the Founder and CEO of Peak Support. This blog is my take on early-stage companies and innovation. Every so often, there may be a post about culture, networking, family -- you name it. After all, what is a blog if it isn't a tad bit unstructured.

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Archives

    December 2016
    August 2016
    December 2015
    August 2015
    May 2015
    September 2014
    July 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    August 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011

    Categories

    All
    2011
    Accredited Investors
    Airbnb
    App
    Apple
    Bankrupt
    Bankruptcy
    Benjamin Graham
    Best New Business Blog
    Beta
    Blog
    Bob Dylan
    Capital Asset Pricing Model
    Capital Requirements
    Capm
    Coaching
    Codecademy
    Codelesson
    Competitive Strategy
    Continuous Improvement
    Convertible Preferred
    Creative Destruction
    Crowd Sourcing
    Crowd-sourcing
    Customer Insights
    Database
    Data Repository
    Dcf
    Debt
    Design
    Development
    Discounted Cash Flow
    Disruptive Technology
    Ed Tech
    Education
    Education Technology
    Elizabeth Warren
    Entrepreneur
    Entrepreneurship
    Ephemeral Era
    Equity
    Facebook
    Facebook Marketing
    Facebook Mobile Advertising
    Finance
    Finance-ability
    Fortunate
    Function
    Functionality
    Fusion Tables
    Google
    Google Chrome
    Google Docs
    Google Fusion Tables
    Google Spreadsheet
    Google Table
    Hiking
    Innovation
    Instagram
    Institutions
    Intensity Map
    Internet Access
    Internet Platforms
    John Rawls
    Joseph Schumpeter
    Leadership
    Location
    Location-based Data
    Management
    Marketing
    Mba
    Microsoft
    Microsoft Access
    Mobile
    Model
    Nda
    Networking
    Novartis
    Operations
    Participating Preferred
    Pay-off Diagram
    Performance
    Personal Improvement
    Peter Drucker
    Polaroid
    Portfolio Management
    Postagram
    Private Equity
    Product Development
    Risk Free Rate
    Risk Management
    Scale
    Schedule
    Sec Regulations
    Sincerely
    Social Media
    Standards
    Start Up
    Start-up
    Steve Blank
    Table
    Talkto
    Taxation
    Ted Fortsmann
    Treehouse
    Twitter
    User Interface
    Valuation
    Value Chain
    Venture Capital
    Venture Finance
    Warren Buffett
    Water Safety
    Web 3.0
    Working Capital
    Y Combinator

  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Photos
  • My Dad's Photos
  • About Me
  • Contact